in all things is a publication of the Andreas Center at Dordt University
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS
  • Masthead
  • Newsletter
  • Archive
in All things

in All things

Exploring the implications of Christ's presence in all of life.
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Books
  • Culture
  • Devotions
  • Essays
  • Archive
0
February 20, 2018
Tracy Le Blanc

iAt Book Club: “How to Think” Round Table

  • Justin Bailey
Two weeks ago iAt began a book club series featuring the book, “How to Think: A Survival Guide for a World at Odds,” by Alan Jacobs. Return to iAt throughout this week as various voices are added to the series, interact with one another and respond to the book. Series contributors are Myles Werntz, Justin Bailey, Erin Olson, and Mary Nickel. Last week Myles Werntz shared more of his thoughts. In this final week Justin Bailey and Myles Werntz add their final thoughts.

 

Title: How to Think: A Survival Guide for a World at Odds
Author: Alan Jacobs
Publisher: Currency (October 17, 2017)
Paperback: 160 pages
Price: $15.00 (Hardcover)
ISBN: 978-0451499608

In this continued roundtable of Jacobs’ How to Think, I’d like to circle back to the question of online vs. offline thinking. Several of us have expressed 1) an observation that people tend to be less civil in online environments than they would be in person, and 2) the concern that our offline environments are rather homogenous, sorted into clusters based on affinity.

So, we are caught in a bit of a quandary. Offline, we reckon with embodied persons who cannot be so easily “blocked” as their online counterparts, but these offline interlocutors usually think along the same lines as we do. Online, we encounter significant ideological diversity, but the shape of our engagement – with written words rather than an embodied person – diminishes the empathy that we might otherwise offer to rival ideas. What is the way forward for cultivating the forbearance (a great word, Mary) that so often fails?

I think Myles is right to bring up virtue, and to inquire as to how these virtues might be inculcated into our common life. It is one thing to say, “we should all listen to others’ views in good faith!”, and quite another to ask what practices, institutions, technologies, and cultural currents might form us to do so. There certainly seem to be no shortage of currents that encourage us to label and lump.

We might ask this question for both our online and offline environments, since they have a reciprocal relationship with one another. Neither can be abandoned when it comes to learning how to think, and as mentioned above, both domains offer unique challenges and unique opportunities.

Just yesterday, I saw a study that found a significant difference in how we process opposing views in written form compared with when we actually hear a person’s voice (recorded or otherwise). There is, after all, a bit of the body in the voice, and hearing someone audibly explain her own viewpoint tends to diminish our instinctual reactions to dismiss what is being said.

This made me wonder, can advocating social media forms that allow us to hear (literally) the voices of others help us think more clearly? I’m not even sure what that kind of online dialogue would look like – all of us read more quickly than we listen – but maybe it is precisely our addiction to saving time and cognitive space (as Erin points out) that stop real thinking before it starts. If we are going to change the way we think together, it will require not just the aspiration to virtue but new practices, technologies, and mediating structures to break us of destructive habits.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest

Get new articles by email!

Related Articles

  • Books
  • book review
  • technology
  • thinking

About Justin Bailey

Justin Ariel Bailey serves as Assistant Professor of Theology at Dordt University. He works at the intersection of theology, culture, and ministry, and his written work has appeared in publications such as Christian Scholars Review and the International Journal of Public Theology. He is the author of Reimagining Apologetics (IVP Academic, 2020). He is an ordained minister in the Christian Reformed Church, and he has served as a pastor in Filipino-American, Korean-American, and Caucasian-American settings.

Read more articles by Justin Bailey »

Post navigation
iAt Book Club: “How to Think” Round Table
iAt Book Club: “How to Think” Round Table

Reader Comments

  • Joshua Steele on What Are You Giving Up For Lent? A Review of LentThanks so much for reviewing and sharing about our "Lent" book! :)
  • Tom on Movie Review: ParasiteHard to take your review seriously, when you can't even get the names of the...
  • Sharon on Answering Your Question: Is Christian education tuition a tithe?I have often wondered why tithing is talked about in churches, but yet the skilled...

Get iAt by Email

Most Read Articles

  • Apocalypse Now, Then, and Forever: A Review of A Children’s Bible
    Apocalypse Now, Then, and Forever: A Review of A Children’s Bible

@in_all_things

  • https://t.co/bLJ8EF7rHC "...the narratives of the Scripture extend beyond the comforting and into the disquieting a… https://t.co/EbAzGYpYZN6 hours ago
  • https://t.co/inWZXtPcmB "...if we are not careful, we believe that our professional accomplishments are the measure… https://t.co/tnAvLPZFQB2 days ago
  • https://t.co/CuOEbBGsT5 "In many Protestant traditions, like the one I grew up in, Lent is an overlooked season of… https://t.co/PBN3oKugTE7 days ago
© 2020 in all things • a project of The Andreas Center at Dordt University • Sitemap • Terms • Privacy • DMCA • iAt
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • RSS
tweet

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest