Comments 5

  1. Another factor to consider when choosing your child’s school (or choosing to homeschool) is one’s baptismal vows.

    I made vows when my children were baptized to, “instruct this child by word and example, with the help of the Christian community, in the truth of God’s Word, and in the way of salvation through Jesus Christ.” Sometimes homeschooling is the way to accomplish this. Sometimes excellent Christian day schools or church Sunday schools are available with more resources than a homeschool environment can provide. Day schools can especially bring the “help of the christian community” to bear in a collective way for a whole community of Christian children (and in a few rare cases I have to admit that might not be the case and homeschooling is still a better option.) My point is twofold:

    1.) Most Christians make baptismal vows to provide a Christian education for their children (the method of which is their responsibility to choose.)

    2.) Most Christians vow to do this in community (synergistically, if you will) with other Christians.

    Disclaimer: I work for a Christian College. Homeschooling has a tendency to reduce the income of my surrounding community of Christian school teachers! I have no philosophic objection to homeschooling, but I think when Christian day schools are available the bar is rather high for the needed quality of a homeschool alternative. Especially if the church comes through in communal style and in keeping with it’s side of the baptismal covenant vows, “economic reasons” should not factor into the decision at all IMHO.

    1. Doug, I don’t believe that is true of “most Christians,” including the majority of Christians who baptize infants. The ancient, historic forms for baptismal vows say nothing about education. I think you are describing what is normal for small subset of reformed protestants who historically have seen public schools as antithetical to their beliefs and values. Understanding how other Christians see home/schooling and why they do it is critical to dialoguing with them productively.

      Many reformed protestants, like other religious groups in the US, have seen public schools as sufficiently aligned with their views and values to be acceptable. Historically that perspective was adopted by socially and politically enfranchised white Protestants at the same time that Jewish and typically “less white” Catholic immigrants from southern and eastern Europe were arriving. The outsider minorities wanted to avoid assimilation on others’ terms, so they often developed private, religious schools. As a result of this history the entire issue remains framed in ethnic, racial, and class conflict. Acknowledging this is a key first step in understanding and graciously dealing with people who relate faith and education in different ways.

      I have known homeschooling families of all religious and denominational flavors, and I think they would all be rather irritated by the suggestion that they unjustly compete with and deprive Christian schools of funding while also (perhaps) delivering an inferior education. I share the latter concern but would apply it to all forms of schooling where there is insufficient oversight or a lack of standards.

      I’ve found that Christian homeschoolers often reject Christian day schools due to differences that are deeper than whatever unity a common “Christian” identity may be thought to imply. There may be doctrinal or other ideological differences.

      Families using the Abeka curriculum and related materials, including some “classical schooling” programs have often been sold on a certain theory of pedagogy and developmental psychology that are not rooted in good sense or science. There can also be a desire to reject the modernism of mainstream schools. These parents recognize public and private institutions tend to deploy functionally identical practices and structures rooted in the historic needs of the military and industrial state.

      Home schooling undeniably lets families lead in the building of their own culture and community in a unique and powerful way. While this does not appeal to me personally, I see value in their radical critique and principles. Public and private, religious and secular schools can learn from those who opt out and even partner with them in productive ways.

  2. Here is one more factor to consider in the decision to homeschool: Christian parents who baptize their children usually vow to, “instruct these children by word and example, with the help of the Christian community, in the truth of God’s Word, and in the way of salvation through Jesus Christ.” The congregation present vows to the children being baptized to, ” welcome them in love, to pray for, encourage, and help nurture them in the faith.” I point out in particular that homeschooling or Christian day schools can fulfill the parent’s vows to instruct their children and the congregation’s vow to provide community and nurture.

    Although the best choice will depend on the total context of the situation, the choice to homeschool or not should be made in consideration of these baptismal vows. It is an unfortunate breakdown of Christian community if “economic reasons” dictate the choice rather than more substantive reasons related to instructing the children in the way of salvation. (I’m not writing in favor of either homeschooling or Christian day schools. I’m just calling attention to a factor not previously mentioned and another factor that should have minimal or no influence in an ideal world.)

    1. I agree that, in an ideal world, economics would not be a deciding factor when it comes to educational choice. Though I don’t know all the details of it, I appreciate the model used in Sioux Center, with congregations contributing towards “fair share” to lower the cost of tuition payments at Christian schools.

      In our case, we were definitely committed to giving our kids a Christian education–it was a matter of how we could feasibly do so in our situation. For us, homeschooling was feasible, and has turned out to be a wonderful adventure.

      1. Dawn, we seem to be in agreement.

        By the way, I did not intend to post twice on the topic. At 11:00 AM I thought I had posted the comment. Later I checked for any responses and my comment was missing. I was a bit in a hurry that morning, so I thought I had perhaps forgotten to click on something and thus failed to post. Thus I tried again at 3:30 PM. But oddly, when that one posted then the previous one also posted! (Or at least that’s my impression of what happened.)

What are your thoughts about this topic?
We welcome your ideas and questions about the topics considered here. If you would like to receive others' comments and respond by email, please check the box below the comment form when you submit your own comments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.